Dublin, Jan. Dec. 17, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The “IRT Benchmarks and Market Dynamics (Version 4)” report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com’s supply.
The Interactive Response Technology (IRT) space, sometimes referred to as Randomization and Trial Supply Management (RTSM), has been evolving since 2014.
Over the years, clinical technology has been driven by the need for integration, resulting in a landscape of integrated technology providers and full-service CROs offering IRT as part of other technology suites. There are few dedicated IRT providers among the market leaders, and customers continue to value integration with EDC, CTMS, eCOA and other technologies.
The clinical technology industry continues to undergo many changes, including mergers, acquisitions, and spin-offs among leaders in the field. Additionally, decentralized trials disrupt traditional clinical trial approaches, challenging IRT providers to support direct patient transport and other unmet needs. Amid all the turmoil, publishers aim to keep abreast of the latest trends in clinical technology and keep a close eye on outsourcing trends and vendor performance.
This report provides an in-depth look at the IRT provider evaluation process, including which criteria are most important in selecting a provider, the role of build complexity in provider selection, and key quality measures of an IRT system.
Also included is an overview of outsourcing trends, such as the use of preferred vendor agreements, the rate of outsourcing to third-party vendors by company size, user suggestions for improvements to the IRT system, and unmet needs in decentralized trials.
In keeping with the benchmarking methodology used in many publisher reports, the report includes an analysis of key indicators of brand strength, based on pure perception of the market, and brand performance based on what respondents say they have recently compared with service providers. of interaction.
What you will learn:
Pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical or biotech sponsoring organizations and CROs:
- Find out which IRT solutions your peers use most
- Find out which suppliers perform well across 17 key criteria and may be right for your research
- Learn how others in the outsourcing community evaluate and maintain relationships with their favorite suppliers
IRT service provider:
- Understand how much sponsors value various service attributes and technical capabilities when selecting an IRT solution
- Know how your brand is perceived in the marketplace
- Compare your performance to 17 attributes of 21 service providers based on the experience of real users in the IRT outsourcing community
- Read the verbatim responses to learn why respondents preferred a particular solution, what improvements they would like to see in future versions of the IRT, and what suggestions they have for supporting decentralized trials
Main topics:
- IRT Provider Selection Process
- outsourcing trends
- Perspectives from IRT providers
- IRT provider performance
- Company service quality introduction
- research data
Key topics covered:
Copyright and Usage Guidelines
how to use this report
Analysis Notes: Outsourcing Demand
introduce
method
Respondent Demographics and Qualifications
Number of ratings per company
main column
IRT Provider Selection Process
- Elementary School Highlights
- Most Important Supplier Selection Criteria
- Selection criteria are increasingly important
- Complexity of Clinical Trials
- Supplier Selection: Complexity
- Provider Selection: Therapeutic Expertise
- Key quality measures of the IRT system
outsourcing trends
- Elementary School Highlights
- IRT usage
- Preferred Supplier Agreement
- Expected IRT Improvements
- Expected Reporting Improvements
- IRT Performance in Dispersion Tests
- direct to patient
- Unmet IRT needs in decentralized trials – selected statements
Perspectives from IRT providers
- Elementary School Highlights
- Provider familiarity and reported usage
- Industry leadership
- provider preference
- User Preferences for Providers
- Reasons for IRT provider preference
- Part of IRT Vendor Preference – Top 8 Vendors
- Preferred Supplier Improvement Suggestions
- Improvement Suggestions for Preferred Suppliers – Top 8 Suppliers
- cost awareness
IRT provider performance
- Elementary School Highlights
- ability
- user friendliness
- Staff Features/Support
- Notes on Harvey Ball Calculations
- Performance of IRT Providers
- ability
- user friendliness
- Staff Features/Support
Company service quality introduction
research data
- IRT Provider Familiarity and Reported Usage
- IRT Leader, Voluntary
- other responses
- IRT Leader, Prompt
- IRT provider preference
- Reasons for IRT provider preference
- Reasons for IRT Provider Preference – By Provider
- 4G Clinical Prancer RTSM
- Almark IXRS-3
- Ares Global Lifesphere
- Calyx IRT
- Cenduit/Ai Kunwei (CIRT2)
- Clarion RTSM
- endpoint clinical pulse
- Advantages of ICON Flex
- Medidata Rave RTSM
- Medpace ClinTrak IRT
- Oracle
- PPD IRT
- S-Clinica ClinVision IRT
- Signant Health Smart Signal RTSM
- Suvoda IRT
- Veracity Logic (now Veeva RTSM)
- Y Prime IRT
- Preferred Supplier Improvement Suggestions
- Preferred Supplier Improvement Suggestions – By Supplier
- 4G Clinical Prancer RTSM
- Almark IXRS-3
- Ares Global Lifesphere
- Calyx IRT
- Cenduit/Ai Kunwei (CIRT2)
- Clarion RTSM
- endpoint clinical pulse
- Advantages of ICON Flex
- Medidata Rave RTSM
- Medpace ClinTrak IRT
- Oracle
- PPD IRT
- S-Clinica ClinVision IRT
- Signant Health Smart Signal RTSM
- Suvoda IRT
- Veracity Logic (now Veeva RTSM)
- Y Prime IRT
- cost awareness
- choice drivers
- Future Drivers of Choice
- complexity of testing
- The Impact of Complexity on Supplier Selection
- experience preference
- better feature preferences
- IRT as main service provider
- Key quality measures of the IRT system
- Internal vs. Outsourced IRT Usage
- Use preferred provider
- Number of Preferred Suppliers
- Percentage of IRT jobs awarded to preferred providers
- Expected IRT Improvements
- Expected Reporting Improvements
- Future use of dedicated IRT providers and full service companies
- Importance of Technology vs. Professional Implementation/Customization
- IRT Performance in Dispersion Tests
- direct to patient
- Unmet IRT needs in dispersion testing
- slightly fit my needs
- kind of fit my needs
- mainly to meet my needs
- Service provider in-depth analysis
- 4G Clinical Prancer RTSM
- Almark IXRS-3
- Ares Global Lifesphere
- Calyx IRT
- Cenduit/Ai Kunwei (CIRT2)
- Clario RTSM (formerly Bioclinica)
- DSG eCaseLink IRT
- endpoint clinical pulse
- Advantages of ICON Flex
- Medidata Rave RTSM
- Medpace Clintrak IRT
- Alto RTSM
- Oracle
- PPD IRT
- Premier Studies
- S-Clinica ClinVision IRT
- Signant Health Smart Signal RTSM
- Suvoda IRT
- Veracity Logic (now Veeva RTSM)
- Global Clinical Trial IxRS
- Y Prime IRT
Demographics
office location
- career level
- Decision Responsibility
- Number of current clinical trials
- Familiar with clinical technology
- Liability for treatment
About the publisher
For more information on this report, please visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/c249ky
About ResearchAndMarkets.com
ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world’s leading source of international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, top companies, new products and latest trends.
